4 ms·
What I would like, is rather a well-written[1] license that forbids the distribution or sale of machine learning models created from my source code. I would be
by Findecanor 4y ago
What I would like, is rather a well-written[1] license that forbids the distribution or sale of machine learning models created from my source code.
I would be perfectly fine with higher-degree statistical models created from my source code, for personal use only when editing the source code. That would only be a good tool.
That is something that this MIT NO AI license also disallows.
[1] Written by someone more knowledgeable in legalese than I am, so that it becomes water-tight. BTW, personally, I prefer copyleft.
- rognjen 4y agoI'm not more knowledgeable in legalese than you.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- EamonnMR 4y agoWay I see it, either companies will comply with your existing copy left license (and we don't need a new one) or they're going to ignore your license, and adding a 'please don't ignore my license' clause won't do any good.
- carom 4y agoI need to write something like this. Basically open source data for non-commercial uses. Have the non-commercial aspect extend to models trained on the data. The idea being to enable academics and hobbyist but collect from people making money.