3 ms·
this is basically a 51% attack for social proof.
by SuoDuanDao 4y ago
this is basically a 51% attack for social proof.
- shadowgovt 4y agoThe difference being that humans aren't computers and can deal with an attack like that by deciding some sources are trustworthy and sticking to those. If that slows down fact-determination, so be it. We've been skirting the edge of deciding things were fact on insufficient data for years anyway. It's high time some forcing function came along to make people put some work in.
- jjoonathan 4y agoCitogenesis doesn't even need 51%, so that would be a considerable upgrade.