> That's a fair train of thought, and I do agree it's better to embrace the future than to resist it. Would you agree it's better to passively accept some futu

> That's a fair train of thought, and I do agree it's better to embrace the future than to resist it. Would you agree it's better to passively accept some future being pushed on you, or try to influence the shape of that future? There's no such thing as "the future;" there are many possible futures. One of those possibilities "the future" being sold by Uber et. al is rejected, they go bankrupt or pivot to something entirely different, and all except a few are better off for it.