The article quotes Republican adviser George Callas arguing that this would be bad economics because it won't eliminate costs, just shift them to the primary pr

The article quotes Republican adviser George Callas arguing that this would be bad economics because it won't eliminate costs, just shift them to the primary price of the services in question. I disagree. Shifting the costs to the primary price is good economics because it enables consumers to comparison-shop based on price and leads to a more competitive market. That's what companies are trying to hack with hidden fees.