3 ms·
I think what I would add to your comment, and specifically criticize the HN hype around it, is that all these GPT "AI" tools are entirely dependent on the OpenA
by skilled 4y ago
I think what I would add to your comment, and specifically criticize the HN hype around it, is that all these GPT "AI" tools are entirely dependent on the OpenAI API. ChatGPT might have shown a glimpse of spark by smashing two rocks together, but it is nowhere near being able to create a full-blown fire out of it.
Outside of Google and OpenAI, I doubt there is a single team in the world right now that would be capable of recreating ChatGPT from scratch using their own model.
- Q6T46nT668w6i3m 4y agoMeta?
- dagw 4y agoI doubt there is a single team in the world right now that would be capable of recreating ChatGPT from scratch using their own model. Why not? Lack of knowhow or lack or resources? If say Baidu decided to spend a billion dollars on this problem, don't you think they have the skills and resources to quickly catch up.
- pixl97 4y agoIt depends on the nature of the problem at hand. For example if we threw money at a group in 1905 do you think they could have come up with special relativity, or do you believe that it required geniuses working on the problem to have a breakthrough.
- jerf 4y agoI would love to know how much of ChatGPT is "special sauce" and how much of it is just resources thrown at the problem at a scale no one else currently wants to compete with. I am not making any implicit claims here; I really have no idea. I'm also not counting input selection as "special sauce"; while that is certainly labor-intensive, it's not what I mean. I mean more like, are the publicly-available papers on this architecture sufficient, or is there some more math not published being deployed?