4 ms·
> Wait until a slightly more advanced version Yes, and therein lies the issue - that last crucial 1%, 0.1% may be impossible to achieve (sort of like attaining
by somewhereoutth 4y ago
> Wait until a slightly more advanced version
Yes, and therein lies the issue - that last crucial 1%, 0.1% may be impossible to achieve (sort of like attaining lightspeed travel)
- version_five 4y ago... Or self driving cars. At some point they were only a couple years away
- monkeynotes 4y agoThe Internet... I predict the Internet will soon go spectacularly supernova and in 1996 catastrophically collapse. - Robert Metcalfe, in InfoWorld, 1995 Most things that succeed don’t require retraining 250 million people. - Brian Carpenter, in the Associated Press, 1995 Tim Berners-Lee forgot to make an expiry date compulsory . . . any information can just be left and forgotten. It could stay on the network until it is five years out of date. - Brian Carpenter, in the Associated Press, 1995
- anonyfox 4y agoto be fair, looks like we can circumvent the issue by leapfrogging into faster-than-light speeds. I've seen somewhere that real (albeit tiny) warp bubbles were achieved in a lab recently, so its not too far off into SciFi land... probably only a few decades (tm) until its here :D
- kypro 4y agoThe last 1% isn't crucial when doing something as non-critical as sending an email or changing an input field on a website. I write bad emails and deploy awful code all the time. For 99% of problems it just needs to be good enough. The fact some people argue ChatGPT already is already good enough for a lot of use cases should indicate we're not that far from something just as reliable as a human programmer.