3 ms·
It seems you need to get help to explain what to do after persuasion and appeals to conscience have already failed, if not simply making it too expensive to not
by DonHopkins 4y ago
It seems you need to get help to explain what to do after persuasion and appeals to conscience have already failed, if not simply making it too expensive to not innovate with taxes and regulations.
As notacoward asked: surely you don't suggest that raw force is better? Or do you have a better and proven solution? Then share it with us!
Now go reply to his question above and the others that you're pointedly ignoring (unless you still don't have any answers):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34774934 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34774934
- robertlagrant 4y agoI was replying to this: > Making things very expensive is precisely how to motivate people to innovate. I don't think that is the best way to innovate. The ability to make money is the best way. > that you're pointedly ignoring. I don't really understand the mentality of someone who would write this, as though someone can ignore something in piecemeal asynchronous communication. I also don't understand the archaic phrasing, and while I feel I shouldn't have to say this, but I am not at an 18th century finishing school and you are not my headmistress. Again, don't be a libertarian, and get help. You don't have to do this alone.
- notacoward 4y ago> The ability to make money is the best way. Do you really mean to ignore or dismiss the relationship between "ability to make money" and "things becoming more expensive"? That's not going to work here. Raise your game.