4 ms·
On one hand, hellbanning does waste people's time (perhaps even well-intentioned people) and it is regrettable. On the other hand, pg has no obligation to publ
by drx 15y ago
On one hand, hellbanning does waste people's time (perhaps even well-intentioned people) and it is regrettable.
On the other hand, pg has no obligation to publish your comments on his website.
- pyre 15y ago> pg has no obligation to publish your comments on his > website That's true, but 'hellbanning' isn't the only way to achieve this. It's not a "hellbanning" or "publish all comments" decision.
- ubernostrum 15y agoOn the other other hand, if he wants to maintain a site that attracts users, taking their feedback into account is probably a good idea. (notice how no-one said there was an obligation to publish things -- read this article as a piece of feedback, not a demand)
- drx 15y agoI wasn't directly replying to the OP.
- maalox 15y agoWithout visitor input, PG has no website.