3 ms·
Slack has video conferencing. Every redundant tool a company makes workers use makes work less pleasant. I'd expect at some point they'll push them the rest of
by yamtaddle 4y ago
Slack has video conferencing. Every redundant tool a company makes workers use makes work less pleasant.
I'd expect at some point they'll push them the rest of the way onto Teams, to reduce that redundancy. Which will be even worse, because Teams is so incredibly bad.
- aldarisbm 4y agoSlack's video conferencing is archaic compared to something like zoom (maybe not teams), but out of all of the video conferencing tools, slack is the worst.
- OJFord 4y agoIt's at least a decade ahead of Zoom on Linux. The latter's like using 00s Skype.
- lttlrck 4y agoSlack video conferencing was absolutely awful and one of the main reasons we switched to Teams a couple of years back. Is it better now? There seem to be plenty of commenters combining Slack and Zoom so seems not. That's a redundancy right there that Teams solves.
- yamtaddle 4y agoIt used to be god-awful but has been pretty OK for the last year or two. Not as good as Zoom, but close enough for many use-cases. I haven't tried it for really giant "rooms" but 99% of the time those would be better as a broadcast, anyway.