3 ms·
> punish the private citizen buying a second home as an investment property Second property should be taxed a little bit more. 3rd much more, 4th much much mor
by flavius29663 4y ago
> punish the private citizen buying a second home as an investment property
Second property should be taxed a little bit more. 3rd much more, 4th much much more etc.
> has the hell taxed out of that's going straight to the renter
That can be said about anything that has taxes on it: it goes back to punish the final consumer, but in the end it's worth trying to correct the market, be it cigarettes or homes for investment.
- SketchySeaBeast 4y agoI suppose the difference there is that by and large people who find the new tax too onerous can reduce their cigarette consumption or even stop smoking altogether, but people can't just stop renting their home.
- flavius29663 4y agowell yes, but you're still allowing cheap second house, but not third. This means more middle class people can buy an investment home, but they will have to stop there, discouraging landlords with a huge stock of houses. You don't want to discourage investment in houses, just oligopolies/monopolies on the housing stock, and also unoccupied houses.