Both/and. It's a product of neoliberalism, the philosophy that policy-making should happen on the market, and the government's purpose is to protect those marke

Both/and. It's a product of neoliberalism, the philosophy that policy-making should happen on the market, and the government's purpose is to protect those markets from any non-market activities (like unionization). You can argue that "real" free market libertarianism wouldn't prevent strikes, but I think most right minarchists would agree that breaking strikes falls under protection of property rights.