4 ms·
I’m talking specifically about the defense in the article that ‘if they include AGPLv3 in the title then it has to be AGPLv3’ due to the GPL/AGPL being a tradem
by antiterra 4y ago
I’m talking specifically about the defense in the article that ‘if they include AGPLv3 in the title then it has to be AGPLv3’ due to the GPL/AGPL being a trademark owned by the FSF (this is argued in the expert report linked in the article.)
That defense somehow would require a trademark issue with the FSF to be remedied by granting a more lenient license to the third party (PureThink, the defendant here.)