4 ms·
At the time, society did. Meaning most people (most men) did. This is not actually new information for you, right? I think there's a subtext of your question I
by jrochkind1 4y ago
At the time, society did. Meaning most people (most men) did.
This is not actually new information for you, right? I think there's a subtext of your question I am missing?
- colechristensen 4y agoIt’s not 1950. I’m talking about now.
- jrochkind1 4y agoI too would love it if the economy were still such that a family could be supported with only one adult "earning income" outside the home, for the majority of occupations and jobs, but without people having their social and professional roles limited due to gender. I can't imagine any worker would not love this. I don't understand what we're disagreeing about, but if we are and you'd like to discuss it, less sarcasm and implied accusations and rhetorical questions and more just plain saying what you mean would help. Personally, I think that the only way we get this is with popular anti-capitalist movements, to change the nature of the economy to be structured around people's needs instead of maximal exploitation of labor for capitalist profit. But I'm open to hearing about other visions.