4 ms·
This is the future I predicted years ago. I’m betting on selling myself as AI-clean because I know there is a market of people who understand the commercial, le
by unxdfa 4y ago
This is the future I predicted years ago. I’m betting on selling myself as AI-clean because I know there is a market of people who understand the commercial, legal and societal risks associated with it. This is Pandora’s box and I don’t want to be near it.
Verified, carefully reviewed and well sourced information and data still has a place and will have a much higher value than it does now when the signal to noise ratio decreases.
- ianai 4y agoMight be quite the wait for the Butlerian Jihad.
- valine 4y agoThe thing is LLMs can be tested and inaccuracies corrected. In a year when the ChatGPTs of the world have API access to augment their already impressive capabilities, I doubt there will be many complaints about accuracy. You can’t run benchmarks on an AI-clean meat sack.
- unxdfa 4y agoWait until people start training AI on AI output because (a) that's the only source of information left with a large enough corpus size and (b) all other sources are polluted. There's no way of asserting accuracy when we reach that point because the very nature of information and scientific thinking will be corrupted.
- valine 4y agoThere is evidence to suggest that LLMs have recently passed a threshold where their performance can be improved by training on their own output. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11610 https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.11610 I expect your concerns are likely unwarranted.
- danaris 4y agoHow does this do anything but validate their concerns? They're not saying "if we train LLMs on their own output, they'll get slower or worse", they're saying "if we train LLMs on their own output, it gets even harder to actually derive sourcing for what they produce."
- pegasus 4y agoThat's what proponents of self-driving cars keep promising also.
- unxdfa 4y agoSelf crashing cars please.