4 ms·
Another pro in my book: it "compiles" to a single binary. I was writing a small side project and when it was time to deploy, it was as easy as to push the binar
by marionauta 4y ago
Another pro in my book: it "compiles" to a single binary. I was writing a small side project and when it was time to deploy, it was as easy as to push the binary to my server via `scp`. That single binary also includes a copy of `sqlite` since it is a WASM dependency. Also, cross compilation. I can compile it from my m1 mac for an x86 linux server.
- SOLAR_FIELDS 4y agoThis and the built in formatter make me feel like Deno’s developer experience was directly inspired by golang
- marionauta 4y agoI mean, the standard library is inspired in golang's[1], so I would assume that other parts of their design are also inspired by go. [1]: https://deno.land/std@0.177.0#contributing https://deno.land/std@0.177.0#contributing
- ihateolives 4y ago> copy of `sqlite` since it is a WASM dependency How's the performance vs ffi version? I'm about to use deno with sqlite and have to decide which one to use. The lack of WAL in WASM version gives me a pause though.
- marionauta 4y ago> How's the performance vs ffi version? Can't say because I haven't compared them. This is a small personal project that will have less than 10 users, so I'm not that worried.