3 ms·
It's analysing the 2015 Transgender Study, which is an online study that was spammed in transgender online communities and was commissioned by the National Cent
by 0xy 4y ago
It's analysing the 2015 Transgender Study, which is an online study that was spammed in transgender online communities and was commissioned by the National Center for Transgender Equality, an activist organization.
>Forgive me for being extremely suspicious of your ability to evaluate evidence to come to rational conclusions
Did you read your own link? It cites the NCTE study clearly.
- lern_too_spel 4y ago> Did you read your own link? It cites the NCTE study clearly. Yes, I did. The study wasn't commissioned by the NCTE, unlike what you claimed. It uses data from a survey by the NCTE. The people answering the survey have no reason to lie, and the NCTE had no reason to believe that its data would be used in this study years later. You're grasping at straws trying to make your initial claim make sense.
- 0xy 4y agoSo the study's data was provided by an activist organization with every reason to have their finger on the scale? Not to mention the numerous study issues that have been uncovered with this particular online survey including but not limited to: no protection against multiple entries, no protection against non-US entries, errors in the survey flow (multiple commenters remarked that the survey questioned them on conditions they said 'no' to -- indicating faulty survey design). Would you trust a survey on sugar done by Coca-Cola? This is the same thing. Activist surveys are worthless. Conflict of interest doesn't even begin to describe it.