4 ms·
Probably used to work consistently is more apt. What’s the world coming to if you can’t trust that the person pushing a product isn’t actually a paid corporate
by UncleEntity 4y ago
Probably used to work consistently is more apt.
What’s the world coming to if you can’t trust that the person pushing a product isn’t actually a paid corporate shill but is instead a scammer trying to separate you from your money.
There’s probably a distinction between the two, right?
Paris Hilton promoting CryptoKitties vs a fake Paris Hilton promoting CryptoKitties — the difference is obvious.
- minimaxir 4y agoThat's the reason why people who make high-effort deepfakes tend to attract a lot of lawsuits, which serves as a strong check on widespread usage.
- flangola7 4y agoI'm not aware of any deepfake lawsuits at all. You can't sue an anonymous 4chan user or some Russian with a GitHub project
- minimaxir 4y agoIn the case of the original submission, I suspect Joe Rogan's lawyers can sue the energy company explicitly named, and subpoena TikTok for more detailed business identification and ad engagement for quantifying damages.
- rcme 4y agoThe costs of doing that will become exorbitant if the problem becomes widespread.
- coffeebeqn 4y agoEven Coffeezilla selling a fake security or privacy tool for example