5 ms·
Could a F-22 shoot it down? /s
by GalenErso 4y ago
Could a F-22 shoot it down? /s
- rvba 4y agoIgnoring the sarcasm marker. F15s could fire anti satelite missiles in early 1980s. Who knows what "toys" are available 40 years later. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT
- version_five 4y agoBut this isnt an orbiting satellite, it's an object moving at 20 km/s (quoting another post, I dont really know in what direction or relative to what) which is ~Mach 60. I don't know how that compares to satellites - is it close enough we'd expect an anti-satellite missile to work?
- h2odragon 4y agoI think we might be able to put something in front of it; but at that speed I dont think anything we loft does not do more than begin the party early. All the energy it's going to release pretty much happens in the same path, we might just begin the breakup and distribution a second or two before the air otherwise would have.
- margalabargala 4y agoCan't speak to the missiles, but objects in low earth orbit travel at around 7km/s relative to the earth. The benefit of this sort of task is in both cases the target object doesn't move of its own accord, so presumably if you can predict the path of the object with enough precision then it would work. Clearly we can pinpoint a 1m satellite, but no idea on the error bars for a 1m meteoroid.
- kijin 4y agoDepends on what kind of warhead you have on that missile. :) A small nuke could definitely obliterate a 1-meter rock, if you don't mind contaminating a large part of Europe with radioactive dust.
- dmurray 4y agoThis isn't fantasy, either. There were plenty of air-to-air and surface-to-air nuclear-tipped missiles. All of the ones mentioned on Wikipedia [0] have officially been decommissioned for 40+ years, a development due both to disarmament agreements and advances in targeting by conventional missiles. But I wouldn't be shocked to learn there are still some deployed. [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nuclear_anti-aircraft_weapons https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nuclear_anti-aircra...
- rvba 4y agoSome sort of a bunker buster perhaps? ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunker_buster https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunker_buster ) Or a tungusten rod with no warhead at all. Not sure if they arent much bigger than an anti sat missile though.
- throwaway4aday 4y agoDoes an anti-satellite missile work by catching up to a satellite or by intercepting it head on or at a tangent?
- johnaspden 4y agoit's an ironic sarcasm marker
- throwanem 4y agoThe continuous-rod warhead in a Sidewinder will rip the hell out of an aircraft, which is made of tinfoil wrapped around complications. A rock from space, by contrast, is made out of rock wrapped around rock. Assuming charitably that the missile could generate an intercept, you would probably get some sparks, maybe more or less depending on how much of the rock is actually nickel and iron. But basically, the rock is a rock. An AIR-2 Genie likely wouldn't bother it all that much beyond maybe a surface glazing and some neutron activation. The most a Sidewinder will do is expensively nothing.