4 ms·
How is it different from NATS.io that solves most of the problems listed? (except the transactional aspect but I’m not convinced it’s a good thing to have the s
by ngrilly 4y ago
How is it different from NATS.io that solves most of the problems listed? (except the transactional aspect but I’m not convinced it’s a good thing to have the same tool do everything)
- stolsvik 4y agoI see references to NATS multiple times, but I fail to see how it solves what Mats aims to solve? Mats could be implemented on top of NATS, i.e. use NATS as a backend, instead of JMS. (We use ActiveMQ as the broker)