3 ms·
This is outdated, unfortunately. The Russian space program has suffered from immense brain-drain, budget cuts, and corruption, all of which have worn it down ov
by bryananderson 4y ago
This is outdated, unfortunately. The Russian space program has suffered from immense brain-drain, budget cuts, and corruption, all of which have worn it down over 30 years and resulted in vastly reduced quality control.
In the past handful of years, on ISS alone, there have been:
* Progress coolant leak
* Soyuz coolant leak
* Nauka module rogue thruster sending entire station spinning out of control
* Soyuz hull leak
* Launch failure with two crew aboard
* Various low-grade problems on older modules especially Zvezda
I might be forgetting something, that’s just off the top of my head. No, this amount of serious issues is not normal “space is hard” stuff, and nowhere near as many problems have happened with any of the other ISS partner countries.
This is not to mention a steady rise in unscrewed launch failures, especially for Proton but also for Soyuz. Russia was pissing away its dominant position in commercial launch long before sanctions.
The once-great Soviet space program is dying with the world’s longest whimper.
- Nginx487 4y agoWhy "unfortunately"? When space program of basically bigger size North Korea suffers of brain drain and incompetence, it's a good thing by all means (I'm Russian myself)
- bryananderson 4y agoI mean that what the Russian state as a whole has become—including a space program that once made humanity proud—is unfortunate. The current Russian state (space program included) becoming an international pariah cannot happen soon enough, and I would love to see the other ISS partners think seriously about how to continue without Russia (not easy but doable—main capability that must be duplicated is the ability to reboost the station, which is hardly a big unknown problem).