So, the rich pay for convenience? Shocker, even more so when their examples for 'rich' include rhe working poor. The through message though seemed to be that

So, the rich pay for convenience? Shocker, even more so when their examples for 'rich' include rhe working poor. The through message though seemed to be that anyone reliant on government services will be expected to pay a price and that anyone not dependent upon them is rewarded to some degree. Rather than misconstrue captlitalism as a cause of bureaucracy perhaps they should have considered replacing government t services with market drive solutions since they tend to be the ones providing the savings.