4 ms·

It's not clear what the actual license says so people are speculating a bit. Something I found on the Wayback Machine is "Neo4j Enterprise Edition is dual lice

It's not clear what the actual license says so people are speculating a bit. Something I found on the Wayback Machine is "Neo4j Enterprise Edition is dual licensed under Neo4j commercial license as well as under the free Affero General Public License (AGPL) v3." [https://web.archive.org/web/20160327040441/http://neo4j.com/open-source-project/ https://web.archive.org/web/20160327040441/http://neo4j.com/...] That has a link to AGPL's Wikipedia page. So maybe that statement alone is enough to make it AGPL v3 even if they have a modified version of it elsewhere?

chipsa 4y ago
> If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term. If a license document contains a further restriction but permits relicensing or conveying under this License, you may add to a covered work material governed by the terms of that license document, provided that the further restriction does not survive such relicensing or conveying. From the applicable version of their license[0]. Which appears to be the standard AGPL text, excepting the top and bottom. If it's dual licensed, then AGPL terms apply, which allow removing restrictions that get added. 0: https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/blob/3.4/enterprise/neo4j-enterprise/LICENSE.txt https://github.com/neo4j/neo4j/blob/3.4/enterprise/neo4j-ent...