2 ms·
Question: > "For reasons I don’t quite understand —partly, probably lack of instrumentation— the science of chemistry was very slow to emerge..." Answer? > "..
by photochemsyn 4y ago
Question:
> "For reasons I don’t quite understand —partly, probably lack of instrumentation— the science of chemistry was very slow to emerge..."
Answer?
> "..the alchemists, who, in their effort to make gold from cheap base materials, at least attack a problem of the highest social relevance, viz. enable the government to finance its wars without inflicting poverty on the people."
Supposedly the Roman Emperor Diocletian persecuted the alchemists of that era because he feared they'd be able to make gold and raise armies to attack the Roman Empire (and/or debase the Russian currency). This likely set back the state of chemical knowledge, possibly for centuries.
P.S. Nuclear transmutation of elements is now quite common; unfortunately nobody has figured out how to get just the desired isotopic species of an single element from nuclear reaction instead of a pile of unstable isotopes of mixed elemental identity.
- hutzlibu 4y ago"Nuclear transmutation of elements is now quite common; unfortunately nobody has figured out how to get just the desired isotopic species of an single element from nuclear reaction instead of a pile of unstable isotopes of mixed elemental identity." I think centrifugation would get the job done, but it is just not worth the effort at those small quantities.
- adrian_b 4y agoA mass spectrometer can separate perfectly any isotopes from any mixture or chemical substance (by deflecting the ions in electromagnetic fields), but the rate at which this is done is too small for producing usable quantities in a reasonable time and with an acceptable energy consumption.