4 ms·
A famous journalist, American no less, does not agree with you. Also, as soon as that pipeline got blown up, EU got forced to take much more expensive American
by wheelerof4te 4y ago
A famous journalist, American no less, does not agree with you.
Also, as soon as that pipeline got blown up, EU got forced to take much more expensive American liquid gas.
It's not hard to believe in and it makes 100x more sense than Putin blowing it up for funzies.
- bandyaboot 4y agoIt’s not even just a little difficult for you to believe that the US would risk totally destroying its standing within NATO in order to do something that Russia was already doing on their own accord?
- wheelerof4te 4y ago"US standing within NATO?" I have news for you, US is NATO. It does not care what it's "allies" say. And it will do all it can to make them toe the line. And that line is: Russia is the enemy that needs to be dismantled and destroyed. You shall not deal with Russia, period. Why is it difficult for you to understand this simple logic?
- bandyaboot 4y agoWhy is it difficult for you to understand that Europeans have agency and pride like anyone else and they would not “toe the line” if the US did something so brazen and aggressive. It’s absurd.
- dilyevsky 4y ago> A famous journalist, American no less, does not agree with you A famous journalist who believed obl was imprisoned by pakistan in 2006 and the assassination was staged, siria didnt use chemical weapons, and skripals weren’t poisoned by novichok. You see the pattern here?
- ajsnigrutin 4y ago> siria didnt use chemical weapons This was reported at a simmilar timeframe (compared to the war) and from the same groups of people who said iraq had weapons of mass destruction, so not trusting them would not be that stupid... especially if you have better inside sources that "normal people" do.
- latchkey 4y agoEver wondered why they published that piece on substack and not somewhere else?