> That's why you cannot ask any government to protect its citizen digital systems, because there are too much interested in to get security holes for their own

> That's why you cannot ask any government to protect its citizen digital systems, because there are too much interested in to get security holes for their own benefit... Any government that currently exists maybe, but not necessarily any government that is possible. The governmental forms we have now are ancient, designed in a period that pales in comparison to the complexity and power currently available to mankind. The runtime we are in physically supports improvements, but it appears to not support improvements psychologically - you can test this theory by asking questions of agents within the runtime, and you will discover that there is extreme and almost unanimous opposition to improvements, which to me seems highly counter-intuitive but that is what data suggests.