3 ms·
Evidence etc?
by irthomasthomas 4y ago
Evidence etc?
- nuggets_ 4y agoI recommend that you expend the tiny bit of effort required to inform yourself, rather than asking others to spoon-feed you.
- irthomasthomas 4y agoI tried but couldn't find any evidence. Thanks for your useful advice though.
- BobbyJo 4y ago> "It had multiple antennas to include an array likely capable of collecting and geolocating communications," the official added. https://www.ft.com/content/96992b83-58f7-4cdb-9900-a2bc59677ebf https://www.ft.com/content/96992b83-58f7-4cdb-9900-a2bc59677...
- irthomasthomas 4y agoIt had multiple antennas? Holy cow that's bad. That definitely rules out weather balloons then.
- BobbyJo 4y agoDoes it not? Or are you being sincere?
- irthomasthomas 4y agoSorry for the sarcasm, but, honestly, I think it's pretty obvious to most adults that an aerial, or even multiple aerials on a balloon does not rule out it being a weather balloon.
- BobbyJo 4y agoWhat could rule that out in your mind then? Seems to me that if it had hardware that didn't serve any purpose with regard to weather data collection, calling it a weather balloon is, at the very least, an incomplete description, if not intentionally deceptive branding. Especially when said hardware has very clear use cases for intelligence collection.