4 ms·

Reframing your argument to avoid accepting new information is not arguing in "good faith" You're in the wrong here, it's time to walk away.

• the_af 4y ago
  What new information? > You're in the wrong here, it's time to walk away. Nope. The people who are in the wrong are the coach warriors who want to see collapse but aren't unwilling to go fight for it, making arguments from the safety of their countries.
  • Zetobal 4y ago
    Your weapon of choice also seems to be the keyboard.
    • the_af 4y ago
      How so? I'm not calling for any specific course of action, I'm just saying "be thoughtful before arguing in favor of collapse", especially if you don't live in the country under discussion. My "weapon of choice" is calling for restraint before violence.
      • kaba0 4y ago
        Inaction is a political choice, you have already taken a side by doing that.
        • TeMPOraL 4y ago
          That's the go-to lie of people trying to start civil wars and scare people into taking their side. "If you're not with us, you're against us". "Not taking side is just supporting status quo, which is taking a side". War is peace.