3 ms·

Thanks! That is an aspect the fine article omitted, alas. It explains the title as well as giving a reason why a private company couldn't release something und

by Beldin 4y ago

Thanks! That is an aspect the fine article omitted, alas. It explains the title as well as giving a reason why a private company couldn't release something under whatever license they like. Basically: they can, but cannot give the license a trademarked name then.

8note 4y ago
I don't think that would change the actual license on the code though? Just that fsf could sue them over using that name