> So the topic was basically about extending nuclear only in response to the short-term situation? Not about reevaluating it as a valid green energy source? Th

> So the topic was basically about extending nuclear only in response to the short-term situation? Not about reevaluating it as a valid green energy source? The Green Party sees nuclear energy as the evil. Never they consider it as green energy. Extending nuclear was a short-term compromise. I don't know how they want to supply the industry with only renewable energy. I'm not deep enough into that topic.