Just posing the question of criminal liability for FOSS devs is weird. Moreover, all the proposed solutions are "keep the samaritans non-liable", but prevent th

Just posing the question of criminal liability for FOSS devs is weird. Moreover, all the proposed solutions are "keep the samaritans non-liable", but prevent them from making any money (or just a very low sum/year) off FOSS. What gave these policy makers right to do this? What kind of perverted mind must be present to come up with these arguments?