3 ms·

Their ability to bullshit is indeed a weak spot that should (and probably will) be addressed. However, I don't think the average person is not aware of that, no

Their ability to bullshit is indeed a weak spot that should (and probably will) be addressed. However, I don't think the average person is not aware of that, nor fails to notice it. Or put another way, how often are legacy search results wrong or misleading? ChatGPT is incredibly useful despite it's limitations... imho.

BaseballPhysics 4y ago
> Their ability to bullshit is indeed a weak spot that should (and probably will) be addressed. I actually don't think that's possible without a complete change in approach: https://nautil.us/deep-learning-is-hitting-a-wall-238440/ https://nautil.us/deep-learning-is-hitting-a-wall-238440/ https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-... > However, I don't think the average person is not aware of that, nor fails to notice it. You massively over estimate the average person. The average person has no idea what chatgpt, LLMs, or generative AIs are. They certainly have no idea how they can go wrong. And placing the output right in with the search results gives it an air of authority that the average person will not question. I guarantee the average person will uncritically take anything chatgpt produces as straight truth, and it will cause problems.