5 ms·
I think this is a neat idea in theory, but for any long term value to be gained, a military power would need to practice generating at least medium-scale sortie
by int0x2e 4y ago
I think this is a neat idea in theory, but for any long term value to be gained, a military power would need to practice generating at least medium-scale sorties many times to know if this strategy was really viable, and specifically, since this strategy is so reliant on scale and weather - you would need to also test launching at some scale at your actual target (even with dummy payloads) prior to the real attack (i.e.: what if once you get to a wave that's 10k/100k strong, they start to mess with your weather projections?)
Basically, I think this is a strategy that's effective at scaring the US citizenry, but it is such a bad idea in practice no good adversary would choose this instead of the usual nuclear deterrent.
- dirtyid 4y agoUS seems invested in interceding in PRC-TW scenario, nuclear deterent will set ceiling of escalation but conventional deterrent raises floor of US particapation. PRC needs credible conventional CONUS vunerability to deter US conventional intervention in first place instead of relying on nuclear to limit scope of conventional war that current US admin/blob still thinks can be fought.