3 ms·
Nothing about the GPLv3 license created that except that the authors wanted (or maybe didn't really want to) release under that license. And if they like to rel
by daveguy 4y ago
Nothing about the GPLv3 license created that except that the authors wanted (or maybe didn't really want to) release under that license. And if they like to release under that license. Good for them! But I don't think they should require other software creators to release under the same license. And that's why I won't use GPL software other than LGPL.
- trelane 4y agoYou said > The distinction is 100% about what a future developer can do or not do. I pointed out that this was incorrect. > But I don't think they should require other software creators to release under the same license. So you think end-user-hostile software is fine. I guess we disagree.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]