> but then there's also those things that disagree with mond rendering the need for introducing a bunch of new stuff on top of it anyway. And LCDM does this to

> but then there's also those things that disagree with mond rendering the need for introducing a bunch of new stuff on top of it anyway. And LCDM does this too. If you want a comprehensive survey of the tuning done by each model to fit observations, see: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06936v3 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.06936v3 It seems clear that neither approach is satisfactory as they stand, but the resistance to recognizing the significant flaws in LCDM is frankly puzzling.