3 ms·
Maybe, but it's not a pangram. ChatGPT is slippery. (There's no "k". I stopped looking there.)
by fortran77 4y ago
Maybe, but it's not a pangram. ChatGPT is slippery. (There's no "k". I stopped looking there.)
- bshimmin 4y agoThere's a "b" in "about", but there's no "k" or "m".
- tsm 4y agoNo 'm' either: (def phrase "Fjord zoologists quip jovially, waxing lyrical about xanthic lutrines") (require '[clojure.string :as str]) (-> phrase str/lower-case distinct sort) ;; => (\space \, \a \b \c \d \e \f \g \h \i \j \l \n \o \p \q \r \s \t \u \v \w \x \y \z) (edit: OP originally just mentioned 'k' but then ninja-edited in the 'm')
- bilsbie 4y agoIt was the best of times, it was the BLURST of times! You stupid monkey!"
- einpoklum 4y agoIt's not slippery, it's just that it is not constrained to only make claims it can verify (and it's not obvious it's even aiming at validity/truthfulness in the first place).
- madcaptenor 4y agoAnd those are the sort of words that are rich in unusual letters and therefore likely to appear in pangrams in the training data.
- anonu 4y agoI think I know where the bug is: there needs to be 26 unique characters. The first letter is capitalized and there's a space.... so technically, 26 ASCII chars - but not all 26 letters of the alphabet.