4 ms·
You're not using it, only services on top of it, so you're not entitled to it. On the other hand, there's a reason Google forbids even spelling the letters AGP
by rakoo 4y ago
You're not using it, only services on top of it, so you're not entitled to it.
On the other hand, there's a reason Google forbids even spelling the letters AGPL, because then they might have to give you the source code. Copyleft doing exactly what it's supposed to do.
- nix23 4y ago>You're not using it, only services on top of it, so you're not entitled to it. So when i sit in a car (service) i don't use the Street (below the service)? But you are right, and that's exactly why the GPL is NOT preventing Closed-source software per se.
- leonidasv 4y agoGPL talks only about "object code or executable form" as means of software distribution. When you ping a network server, it's not covered by the license. That's the whole point of AGPL: it covers network access as a mean of software distribution too.
- nix23 4y agoThat's what i wrote, and that's why i said the GPL is not preventing Closed-source systems...per se.