3 ms·
Assuming from context that the socio-political stance you have in mind is something like American leftism, it's always had a strong religious element to it. The
by PessimalDecimal 4y ago
Assuming from context that the socio-political stance you have in mind is something like American leftism, it's always had a strong religious element to it. The recent purity spiral is a difference only of quantity but not really one of quality (in other words, not a bedrock shift from the past).
Its roots are religious too, stemming from Puritanism brought to America's northeast, spreading westward to the burnt-over district [1] of western New York, and eventually the West Coast [2]. Puritan ideas like collective salvation and rooting out the bad thinkers showed up initially as literal witch hunts, and today as metaphorical witch hunts seeking to sniff out those who aren't true (enough) believers. It still takes the rough shape of Christian offshoot too, with a notion of original sin (think "White Guilt" or something related), has martyrs and saints, taboos, holidays and customs like any other religion.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burned-over_district https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burned-over_district
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Nations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Nations
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- thethimble 4y agoThe book Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt was really interesting and relevant to your point. Haidt claims that every moral framework has a set of sacred beliefs that are not unlike religious beliefs. In other words every framework has a set of foundational axioms that have to be accepted on faith.