2 ms·

Is this meant to be irony? You seem to have not read the link. It's a meta-review of 78 randomised control trials. It is literally the opposite of cherry pickin

Is this meant to be irony? You seem to have not read the link. It's a meta-review of 78 randomised control trials. It is literally the opposite of cherry picking. You then cherry pick one review saying the opposite.

anigbrowl 4y ago
Say the line, Bart.
sampo 4y ago
> It's a meta-review of 78 randomised control trials. If your only tool is meta-reviews of RCT studies, then condoms don't work either: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010662.pub2/full https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD... https://jech.bmj.com/content/65/2/100 https://jech.bmj.com/content/65/2/100