4 ms·
It always amazes me when someone ignores the 99 studies that show masks are effective, and highlights the one that says maybe they’re not. Cherry picking in act
by standeven 4y ago
It always amazes me when someone ignores the 99 studies that show masks are effective, and highlights the one that says maybe they’re not. Cherry picking in action!
Just one of the literally hundreds of studies showing effectiveness: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883189/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7883189/
- gadders 4y agoIs this meant to be irony? You seem to have not read the link. It's a meta-review of 78 randomised control trials. It is literally the opposite of cherry picking. You then cherry pick one review saying the opposite.
- anigbrowl 4y agoSay the line, Bart.
- sampo 4y ago> It's a meta-review of 78 randomised control trials. If your only tool is meta-reviews of RCT studies, then condoms don't work either: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010662.pub2/full https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD... https://jech.bmj.com/content/65/2/100 https://jech.bmj.com/content/65/2/100