3 ms·
As far as I understand, that's a consequence of the automatic insertion of trailing semicolon by the lexer, not a decision by gofmt. It's explained here: https:
by bxparks 4y ago
As far as I understand, that's a consequence of the automatic insertion of trailing semicolon by the lexer, not a decision by gofmt. It's explained here:
https://go.dev/doc/effective_go#semicolons https://go.dev/doc/effective_go#semicolons
- layer8 4y agoI see. That doesn’t seem very sensible in potential-beginning-of-block contexts, in particular in the if case where an implicit empty statement is deduced after the condition.
- nordsieck 4y ago> That doesn’t seem very sensible in potential-beginning-of-block contexts, in particular in the if case where an implicit empty statement is deduced after the condition. Are you referring to C style if statements where you can elide the braces? In go the braces are mandatory, so I don't think that really applies.
- layer8 4y agoI was referring to the Go documentation linked above: > One consequence of the semicolon insertion rules is that you cannot put the opening brace of a control structure (if, for, switch, or select) on the next line. If you do, a semicolon will be inserted before the brace, which could cause unwanted effects. I was assuming that the “unwanted effects” are not simply a syntax error.