Yeah, the last paragraph of this article is shockingly vague and inconclusive relative to the argument presented in the rest of the piece. > It’s just a hunch

Yeah, the last paragraph of this article is shockingly vague and inconclusive relative to the argument presented in the rest of the piece. > It’s just a hunch at this stage, but I suspect that both within and beyond the Right, re-opening the question of science, flesh and sculpture from the vantage-point not of technology but aesthetics will do a great deal to clarify where the cultural fissures really lie in post-print politics. Like, what is this even supposed to mean? Are you talking about a conservative right or a traditionalist one? What does this "clarification" look like, outside of subtly angry reactionary feminist literature? The more I read Substack, the less convinced I am that I'm missing out on meaningful content.