4 ms·
First, I think foreign-TLD sites are still what they mean by "foreign sites". This is significant when you consider that domestic-TLD sites are already in US j
by thebigshane 15y ago
First, I think foreign-TLD sites are still what they mean by "foreign sites". This is significant when you consider that domestic-TLD sites are already in US jurisdiction even though the server may be foreign.
Secondly, saying "no American company will be affected" is exactly the kind of generalization required when talking in soundbites (what is required when talking on TV). You can call it a lie, but only if you acknowledge that nearly everyone on TV lies.
- RichardPrice 15y agoIt damages credibility if you say categorically that no American company could be targeted by SOPA, when in fact they could be. It erodes the sense that viewers should believe the rest of what you say. Richard Cotton also mentioned that due process will be respected, and only sites that are wholesale engaged in piracy will be affected. When people are loose with language, you wonder what the precise situation actually is, and it muddies the debate. Few people have a subtle understanding of what SOPA actually entails (I still don't understand all the details), and this is because the proponents say 'We're targeting thieves' and the opponents say 'This will break the internet', and sometimes a reader gets the sense that no-one is communicating the precise, un-dramatized, facts. If the reader doesn't feel they have these facts, it's difficult to draw your own conclusions.