> Allow them to decide without harassment. vs > To refuse a beer in Germany is an affront that I would like to weigh against the risk of cancer. Who is hara

> Allow them to decide without harassment. vs > To refuse a beer in Germany is an affront that I would like to weigh against the risk of cancer. Who is harassing who if someone feels that their choice of not drinking beer will cause affront? Hoping that cultural norms will change and it will cease to be an affront to refuse a drink is not harassing. People exerting social pressure on others who refuse a beer is. That is why I'm hoping any such practices disappear. Exactly for the reason you state, to allow each to decide without harassment.