3 ms·

> and offer something seemingly different, but ultimately equivalent, commercially? > it'll have to be solved with new laws Tbh, if an AI will fill out a need

> and offer something seemingly different, but ultimately equivalent, commercially? > it'll have to be solved with new laws Tbh, if an AI will fill out a need I had for cheaper than a human would, thn I'd see that as positive. Be it image asset creation, ghost writing or whatever. Restricting that with laws seems like it would only cut innovation because it takes away jobs. Kinda like forbidding robot assemblers in industry. Tough, take that from a person on the consumer side of creative works.

svara 4y ago
If we replace a big chunk of our media with derivative works created by copyright laundering engines, we're destroying the incentives to be original and creative. But we absolutely need originality and creativity! Living in a world where everything looks sort of like SEO spam sounds like a dystopia to me. Note, I don't think those technologies should or will be banned. There just have to be rules in place that allow creators to opt-in to having their work used as training data, with appropriate remuneration. If that makes some AI business models unworkable, that's fine with me as long as we don't destroy our creative and inventive people's livelihoods.
- gverrilla 4y ago
  Let's be honest most of that art is intended to make you buy things you don't really need. It's already a SEO spam all around. The internet is not aesthetically pleasing at all. Real art will survive, don't worry. True creativity emerges naturally from human experience and is not dependent on a specific industry. Also now it will be more accessible. I think baboon Freud agrees [id]! id: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1073730007437955135/1073739951352586321/lpsss_a_baboon_holding_a_cigar_with_a_sad_face_153b1e6f-4b52-49a1-a74f-6708f25b468c.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1073730007437955135/1...

svara 4y ago

If we replace a big chunk of our media with derivative works created by copyright laundering engines, we're destroying the incentives to be original and creative. But we absolutely need originality and creativity! Living in a world where everything looks sort of like SEO spam sounds like a dystopia to me. Note, I don't think those technologies should or will be banned. There just have to be rules in place that allow creators to opt-in to having their work used as training data, with appropriate remuneration. If that makes some AI business models unworkable, that's fine with me as long as we don't destroy our creative and inventive people's livelihoods.

gverrilla 4y ago
Let's be honest most of that art is intended to make you buy things you don't really need. It's already a SEO spam all around. The internet is not aesthetically pleasing at all. Real art will survive, don't worry. True creativity emerges naturally from human experience and is not dependent on a specific industry. Also now it will be more accessible. I think baboon Freud agrees [id]! id: https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1073730007437955135/1073739951352586321/lpsss_a_baboon_holding_a_cigar_with_a_sad_face_153b1e6f-4b52-49a1-a74f-6708f25b468c.png https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1073730007437955135/1...