4 ms·
Definitely CQ - pretty impressive in that regard. Having worked with the platform, I can tell you -good- CQ5 developers are very expensive and hard to acquire.
by notjustanymike 15y ago
Definitely CQ - pretty impressive in that regard. Having worked with the platform, I can tell you -good- CQ5 developers are very expensive and hard to acquire. Conde Nast is learning this the hard way after they committed to converting all their properties over to CQ.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- spydum 15y agoTrue enough, but with a total cost of $18m, I'd guess they went full consultancy -- not done in house. Completely unrelated, does MJK mean anything to you?