3 ms·
I reiterate; https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34497650 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34497650
by News-Dog 4y ago
I reiterate; https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34497650 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34497650
- rvz 4y agoWell, Google did say 'Bard is an experimental conversational AI service'. Not even ChatGPT or Bing AI are any more accurate or reliable and both are also experimental and in preview. [0] I can confidently say that this stock drop is a typical over-reaction from the markets. Today, neither AI is ready to even challenge or replace search engines due to their hallucination issues and LLMs like ChatGPT are unable to cite their sources or even explain them. If you cannot trust the output from a chatbot or an AI to generate correct or factual information, then it has little chance in being useful enough to be a reliable search engine replacement. [0] https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/7/23589536/microsoft-bing-ai-chat-inaccurate-results https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/7/23589536/microsoft-bing-ai...
- JellyBeanThief 4y agoI don't know that people are reacting to the error per se, so much as they're reacting to where they saw it: in a major, high-glitz public announcement. Like NPR quotes others, the human beings who prepared the announcement could've googled to make sure they didn't demo a product working as unintended. I think people understand AI's current limitations. What they've lost confidence in is Google's judgement, not Bard's.
- ecf 4y agoSome have argued that Reddit was doing a cleanse of anything advertiser-unfriendly (quarantining subs, zero tolerance towards violence/anti-lgbtq+, etc) for its IPO. After these events I’d argue that OpenAI was paying them huge lumps of $$$$ to clean up the dataset that was training their LLM. Why not let unpaid moderators do the dirty work of classification and labeling?