4 ms·
So you think it's justified to have a petulant attitude when you're expected to follow employment, fire safety, and environmental regulations? If he was happy
by KennyBlanken 4y ago
So you think it's justified to have a petulant attitude when you're expected to follow employment, fire safety, and environmental regulations?
If he was happy to drop his prices to dump his product to force out competitors, than he should have been happy to accept the additional costs of complying with workplace, fire safety, and environmental regulations everyone else has to comply with. Oh wait...he wasn'.
Or he could have raised his prices. But then, he would have actually had to compete on product quality, and it's clear the only thing he really had going for him was that shapers were used to his product and it was cheap.
Since he's closed up, the market has undergone substantial innovation and improvement, including
Literally nothing stopped him from pursuing partnerships to develop and produce more environmentally friendly products, but that's a lot less fun than simply being yet another whiny, entitled boomer.
- mlyle 4y ago> So you think it's justified to have a petulant attitude when you're expected to follow employment, fire safety, and environmental regulations? I mean exactly what I said, not the words you're cramming in my mouth. The letter he wrote acknowledges the regulations are important and that the enforcement approach taken by authorities are justified. It also makes it clear that he has tried to comply, and is concerned that he had no viable path towards compliance, and potential unbounded liability if he got it wrong. And he got scared and bolted. > but that's a lot less fun than simply being yet another whiny, entitled boomer. Nice slur. He was actually a member of the silent generation. It seems like you're really upset about all this, throwing around insults and "petulant" in your comments and leaving multiple incomplete sentences around.