4 ms·
Did Bard make a mistake? Q: "What new discoveries from JWST can I tell my 9 year old child?" A: "JWST took the very first pictures of
by grupthink 4y ago
Did Bard make a mistake?
Q: "What new discoveries from JWST can I tell my 9 year old child?"
A: "JWST took the very first pictures of a planet outside our solar system"
Source: NASA’s Webb Takes Its First-Ever Direct Image of Distant World - https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/09/01/nasas-webb-takes-its-first-ever-direct-image-of-distant-world/ https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/09/01/nasas-webb-takes-its-...
So, it took the first picture of a (particular) exoplanet, which is not to be confused with the first picture (ever) of an exoplanet. There is a misunderstanding here.
- stonogo 4y agoNo. Another telescope had previously photographed this specific exoplanet. This information is in the linked article. No interpretation of Bard's output here is accurate. It is wrong.
- hgsgm 4y agoJWST took the first picture of LHS 475 B.
- stonogo 4y agoAfter ChatGPT's training cutoff of 2021. With the information the AI has in its dataset, it is incorrect. It's unaware of things that happened last month, and "put out wrong answers and wait to see if they come true" is not a business case OpenAI should rely on.
- knaik94 4y agoI feel like there's some bigger mistake I missed regarding that controversy. People are aware of chatbots making things up. Microsoft had that poor AI Tay where users' adversarial prompts effectively courrupted its working dataset and it became racist. I know AI doesn't have feelings, and yet I still feel some sadness for how much it was attacked. Maybe because I liked the idea and wanted it to be successful. Regardless of the validity, I think it's still fair to call it a mistake because of the ambiguity. Most people would misunderstand the answer to mean something it doesn't. But there was such a strong reaction in media about it, when I would have assumed most people wouldn't care. Google never promised an AI chatbot never got anything wrong, and no one I knew expected differently. It makes me think about how many other news stories, for things out of my field, are like the Bard situation. I'll just never know because I won't gain expertise in it.
- mlyle 4y agoI think the concern is that it reinforces impression that the Google announcement is rushed and half-baked in response to competitive pressures.
- mlyle 4y ago> So, it took the first picture of a (particular) exoplanet c.f. > Astronomers discovered the planet in 2017 using the SPHERE instrument on the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope in Chile and took images of it using short infrared wavelengths of light. Webb’s view, at longer infrared wavelengths, reveals new details that ground-based telescopes would not be able to detect because of the intrinsic infrared glow of Earth’s atmosphere. The JWST news is that JWST took the first photo it has ever taken of an exoplanet.
- hgsgm 4y agoDifferent planet. JWST took the first picture of LHS 475 B, confirming it exists. https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Webb/Webb_confirms_its_first_exoplanet https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Webb/W...
- mlyle 4y agoThe source that Google cited states "The exoplanet in Webb’s image, called HIP 65426 b" which had been previously imaged. Sure, JWST has also taken the first picture of a different exoplanet-- 2 months later. But JWST did not: * Take the first picture of an exoplanet * Take the first picture of the exoplanet in the cited source (instead, it took its first picture of any exoplanet).
- amf12 4y agoI think this highlights a big limitation of LLMs. It doesn't "understand" the text. It's just piecing words together based on the probability. In this case, the key word was "its", which it ignored - but makes a huge difference to the meaning of the sentence.