3 ms·
> it's that America's adversaries know they can do it without consequences There was a consequence -- we shot it down. > That is the irreversible change it si
by password11 4y ago
> it's that America's adversaries know they can do it without consequences
There was a consequence -- we shot it down.
> That is the irreversible change it signifies, imo.
It's not irreversible. Additional consequences can be initiated at any time.
- motohagiography 4y agoYou don't need to convince me, convince the people who keep sending the ballons, invading allies, and using NATO countries as rocket flyover paths.
- password11 4y ago[flagged]
- jasmer 4y agoHaving it shot down is not a consequence. Diplomatic or economic retribution of some kind would be a consequence.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]