3 ms·
I'd be fine with GMO if it weren't for the pesticides that come with it. https://nutritionfacts.org/video/is-monsantos-roundup-pesticide-glyphosate-safe/ https
by danuker 4y ago
I'd be fine with GMO if it weren't for the pesticides that come with it.
https://nutritionfacts.org/video/is-monsantos-roundup-pesticide-glyphosate-safe/ https://nutritionfacts.org/video/is-monsantos-roundup-pestic...
> But pure glyphosate isn’t sprayed on crops, Roundup is, which contains a variety of adjuvants and surfactants meant to help the glyphosate penetrate into tissues. And indeed when the study was repeated with what’s actually sprayed on GMO crops, there were toxic and hormonal effects even at doses smaller than the 1 or 2% concentration that’s used out on the fields.
> Roundup was found to be 100 times more toxic than glyphosate itself. Moreover, Roundup turned out to be among the most toxic pesticide they tested.
- hinkley 4y agoAt this point any time someone switches from talking about Roundup to glyphosate, they either have an agenda, or they picked up their argument from people who do. Some of the 'inactive' ingredients in Roundup are more toxic than glyphosate, and stick around longer. Spraying it directly on yourself, the glyphosate may or may not be your immediate concern, but touching something that was sprayed weeks ago the glyphosate is the least of your problems, so making it an argument about glyphosate is one you can kind of win. It's very much like the tobacco lobby playbook. Nicotine may not be that bad for you (unless you're a bug) but you aren't smoking nicotine. You're smoking a broadleaf plant exposed to soil minerals and four kinds of pesticides and antifungal compounds (fungi and human livers are susceptible to many of the same chemicals) which may or may not have prevented fungal volatiles from ending up in your lungs alongside the trace amounts of uranium.
- pfdietz 4y agoAnd the smoke is fully of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are strong carcinogens.